How the Migration of Scientific Elites on the National Security of Iran
Abstract
Scientific elites, as an indicator of human capital in the field of social capital, are the factors that, by playing the dual role of facilitator and transformer, cause the crystallization and change of social capital components in the field of national security. Each of the security discourses examines the field of security from a specific perspective, but none of them have assessed the agency and the effectiveness of the scientific elite in removing lasting national security. The aim of this research in the first step is to find a discourse among security discourses that has the greatest potential for the crystallization of the existential nature of elites and in the second step, measuring how the existence or non-existence of elites affects the metaphor of sustainable national security, explaining how this relates to a theoretical and theoretical perspective is a matter that has been addressed in this article by citing library sources and by analytical-descriptive method.
Keywords: Security; Elite; Immigration; Bari Buzan; Copenhagen School
Metadata Record
References 30
- Salehnia, A., & Bakhtyari, H. (2018). Prioritization of National Security Threats in the Islamic Republic of Iran through Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Strategic Studies of public policy, 8(27), 255-277.
- Tabatabai, S. M., & Fathi, M. J. (2014). The Evolution of the Concept of Security in NATO after the Cold War Based on the Copenhagen School, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies of Public Policy (Strategic Studies of Globalization), 5(14).
- Salimi, H. (2005). Virtual Government, Aggressive Realism, International System, Foreign Policy, Quarterly Journal of Public Law Research, 7(17).
- Moshizadeh, H., & Vaseizadeh, N. (2018). International social capital: trust, participation and networks in international society. political quarterly, 48(1), 175-195.
- Qawam, S. A., & Fatemi Nejad, S. A. (2008). The English School as a Pluralist Theory: Explaining the Concepts of the International System, the International Community and the International Community, Encyclopedia of Law and Politics, No. 8
- Ebrahimi, S., & Zamanian, R. (2010). Semantics from the Perspective of the English School in International Relations. Journal of Public Law Research, 12(3), 1-22.
- Ebrahimi, N. (2014). A Comparative Study of Security in the Concept of recent Security Schools, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies, 17(4).
- Jamshidiha, G. H., & Parastesh, S. H. (2007). The dialectic of character and field in Bourdieu's theory of action, Social Science Quarterly, No. 30.
- Montazaran, J. (2016). Studying the issue of elite migration as a national security challenge and presenting solutions to solve it in the vision document of development and progress of the Islamic Republic, 9th Congress of Pioneers of Progress.
- Buzan, B. (2015). People of States and Fear, Fifth Edition, Institute for Strategic Studies.
- Mills, Ch. W., & Mowlana, H. (2009). Power Elites, Institute of Western Studies, Written Culture.
- National Elite Foundation. (11/7/2012). The country's strategic document on elite affairs (signed by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad), High Secretariat of the Cultural Revolution Council.
- Mousavi Rad, S. H., & Ghodsian, H. (2015). Analysis of Elite Migration and the Impact of Deterrent Policies Using System Dynamics, Strategic Management Research.
- Bashirieh, H. (2003). Political Science Education, University of Tehran.
- Goodarzvand, C. M. (2015). Sustainable Development; Indicators and policies. World Politics Quarterly, 4(2).
- Rabiee, A. (2004). Development and Security Concerns (National Security Studies: An Introduction to National Security Theories in the Third World), Political and International Studies, Tehran.
- Arneil, B. (2006). Diverse communities: The problem with social capital. Cambridge University Press.
- Ahn, T. K. (2003). Foundations of social capital. (No:302 F6).
- Hartmann, M. (2007). The sociology of elites (p. 24). London: Routledge.
- Huysmans, J. (1998). The question of the limit: Desecuritization and the aesthetics of horror in political realism. Millennium, 27(3).
- Krause, K., & Williams, M. C. (1996). Broadening the agenda of security studies: Politics and methods. Mershon international studies review, 40(Supplement_2), 229-254.
- Aradau, C. (2004). Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(4), 388-413.
- Booth, K. (1991). Theory of world security (Cambridge Studies in International Relations), Cambridge University Press.
- Bellamy, A. J. (2010). Global politics and the responsibility to protect: from words to deeds, Routledge.
- Collins, H., Weinel, M., & Evans, R. (2010). The politics and policy of the Third Wave: new technologies and society. Critical policy studies, 4(2), 185-201.
- Booth, K. (2007). Theory of world security (Cambridge Studies in International Relations), Cambridge University Press.
- Trachtenberg, M. (2003). The Question of Realism: A Historian’s View, University of Colombia, Los Angeles, 13(1).
- Snyder, J. (2011). Religion and international relations theory. Columbia University Press.
- Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. Routledge.
- Keller, S. I. (1991). Beyond the ruling class: Strategic elites in modern society. Transaction Publishers.