Experiences of emergent change from an applied neurosciences perspective
Abstract
Orientation: Traditional models of planned change are no longer sufficient, amidst constantly changing contexts. Applied neurosciences provides a unique, integrated perspective on human functioning. This study employed a neuroscientific perspective to explore participants’ experiences of the neurobiological impact of emergent change. Research purpose: This study explored participants’ experiences of emergent change from an applied neurosciences perspective. Motivation for the study: The impact of emergent change on employees has been underestimated and under-represented in both the literature and practice. Exploring the original voices of employees, as well as the underlying neural mechanisms and their dynamic interactions that shape these experiences, offers new insights into this complex phenomenon. Research approach/design and method: Nine client-facing employees from a software development company in South Africa, selected through purposive sampling, participated in an interactive qualitative analysis (IQA) focus group and follow-up interviews. Data were collected and analysed by the participants, in keeping with the IQA protocol. Main findings: Experiences of emergent change were found to threaten individuals’ and teams’ basic psychological needs, with a significant impact on the physiological, emotional and interpersonal levels. The participants’ experiences reflected a dysregulation in mental operating network activation, in response to their compromised needs. Implications for practice: The findings imply the need for interventions to enhance employees’ resilience during emergent change by developing the internal stability and external adaptability of their mental operating networks. This aligns with developments related to well-being in the neuroscience literature. Contribution/value add: The study provides an insight into individuals’ and teams’ experiences of emergent change, which can be used to inform new approaches for research-informed interventions and practices aligned with applied neurosciences.
Keywords: applied neurosciences; basic psychological needs; emergent change; interpersonal neurobiology; mental operating networks; organisational psychology
Metadata Record
References 44
- Arden, J.B. (2019). Mind brain gene. W. W. Norton & Co.
- Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss. Volume 1: Attachment. Basic Books.
- Brendel, W.T., & Chou, C.C. (2016). Transforming organizational change through collaborative digital storytelling. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 13(91), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0901.02
- Bushe, G.R., & Marshak, R.J. (2016). The dialogic mindset: Leading emergent change. Organization Development Journal, 34(1), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-301620140000022002
- Chia, R. (1999). A ‘rhizomic’ model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective from a metaphysics of change. British Journal of Management, 10, 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00128
- Cozolino, L. (2017). The neuroscience of psychotherapy: Healing the social brain. W. W. Norton & Co.
- Cozolino, L., & Sprokay, S. (2006). Neuroscience and adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2006(110), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.214
- Dahlitz, M.J., & Rossouw, P.J. (2014). The consistency-theoretical model of mental functioning: Towards a refined perspective. In P.J. Rossouw (Ed.), Neuropsychotherapy: Theoretical underpinnings and clinical applications (pp. 21–41). Mediros.
- Epstein, S. (1998). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In D.F. Barone, M. Hersen, & V.B. Van Hasselt (Eds.), Advance personality (pp. 212–238). Springer Science & Business Media.
- Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In T. Millon, & M.J. Lerner (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Volume 5: Personality and social psychology (pp. 159–184). Wiley & Sons.
- Geldenhuys, D.J. (2020). Valuing and adapting appreciative inquiry to enhance well-being using a neuropsychotherapeutic framework. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 46(2020), a1823. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v46i0.1823
- Grant, D., & Marshak, R.J. (2011). Toward a discourse-centered understanding of organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(2), 204–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310397612
- Grawe, K. (2007). Neuropsychotherapy: How the neurosciences inform effective psychotherapy. Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Hagel, J., Seeley Brown, J., & Kulasooriya, D. (2019). Change from the outside in. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/industry/technology/pragmatic-pathways-scaling-edges.html
- Henson, C., & Rossouw, P. (2013). Brain-wise leadership: Practical neuroscience to survive and thrive at work. Learning Quest.
- Hosking, D.M. (2006). Organizations, organizing, and related concepts. In D.M. Hosking, & S. McNamee (Eds.), The social construction of organisation (pp. 54–68). Copenhagen Business School Press.
- Lawrence, P. (2015). Leading change – Insights into how leaders actually approach the challenge of complexity. Journal of Change Management, 15(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2015.1021271
- Leach, A., Wandmacher, R., Ayres, J., & Groban, T. (2019). The case for internal change capability. Retrieved from https://www.accenture.com/za-en/insight-outlook-creating-internal-change-capability-right-organizational
- Levine, P.A. (2015). Trauma and memory: Brain and body in search for the living past. North Atlantic Books.
- Lewis, L. (2019). Organizational change: Creating change through strategic communication (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
- Liebhart, M., & Garcia-Lorenzo, L. (2010). Between planned and emergent change: decision maker’s perceptions of managing change in organisations. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 10(5), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9524/cgp/v10i05/49976
- Maimone, F., & Sinclair, M. (2014). Dancing in the dark: Creativity, knowledge creation and (emergent) organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(2), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2012-0197
- Menon, V., & Uddin, L.Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: A network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5/6), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0
- Morgan, O.J. (2019). Addiction, attachment, trauma, and recovery: The power of connection. W. W. Norton & Co.
- Northcutt, M., & McCoy, D. (2004). Interactive qualitative analysis: A systems method for qualitative research. Sage Publications.
- Porges, S.W. (2004). Neuroception: A subconscious system for detecting threats and safety. Zero to Three, 24, 19–24.
- Porges, S.W. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic is a challenge to our nervous system. In D.J. Siegel, A.N. Schore, & L. Cozolino (Eds.), Interpersonal neurobiology and clinical practice (pp. 73–84). W. W. Norton & Co.
- Rossouw, P.J. (Ed.). (2014). Neuropsychotherapy: Theoretical underpinnings and clinical applications. Mediros.
- Sanchez, P. (2018). The secret to leading organisational change is empathy. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/12/the-secret-to-leading-organizational-change-is-empathy
- Scarlett, H. (2016). Neuroscience for organizational change: An evidence-based practical guide to managing change. Kogan Page.
- Schore, A.N. (2021). The interpersonal neurobiology of therapeutic mutual regressions in reenactments of early attachment trauma. In D.J. Siegel, A.N. Schore, & L. Cozolino (Eds.), Interpersonal neurobiology and clinical practice (pp. 27–58). W. W. Norton & Co.
- Senior, B., & Fleming, J. (2006). Organizational change (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Siegel, D.J. (2018). Aware: The science and practice of presence. Scribe.
- Siegel, D.J. (2020). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (3rd edn.). Guilford Press.
- Siegel, D.J., Schore, A.N., & Cozolino, L. (Eds.), 2021, Interpersonal neurobiology and clinical practice (pp. 85–112). W. W. Norton & Co.
- Steele, K. (2021). Beyond attachment: Understanding motivational systems in complex trauma and dissociation. In D.J. Siegel, A.N. Schore, & L. Cozolino (Eds.), Interpersonal neurobiology and clinical practice (pp. 85–112). W. W. Norton & Co.
- Tasler, N. (2017). Stop using the excuse ‘organizational change is hard’. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/07/stop-using-the-excuse-organizational-change-is-hard
- Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
- Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009
- Van der Kolk, B. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking Adult.
- Wee, E.X.M., & Taylor, M.S. (2018). Attention to change: A multilevel theory on the process of emergent continuous organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000261
- Weick, R.E., & Quinn, K.E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361
- Wilkinson, M. (2017). A whole-person approach to dynamic psychotherapy. In M. Solomon & D.J. Siegel (Eds.), How people change: Relationships and neuroplasticity in psychotherapy (pp. 73–96). W. W. Norton & Co.
- Worley, C.G., & Mohrman, S.A. (2014). Is change management obsolete? Organizational Dynamics, 43(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2014.08.008