Middle managers’ experiences of resilience during crises: A neuropsychotherapy perspective
Abstract
Orientation: The increasing complexity of global crises, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, regional geopolitical tensions, and armed conflicts (e.g. the war in Ukraine, disputes in the South China Sea and conflict in the Middle East), have the potential to profoundly disrupt organisations. These crises require middle managers to sustain resilience, adapt to volatility and preserve operational continuity amid prolonged adversity and uncertainty. Research purpose: This study investigates how middle managers sustain resilience during times of crises through a neuropsychotherapy perspective. Motivation for the study: Occupying a uniquely demanding position within organisational hierarchies, middle managers must balance strategic directives from senior leadership with the needs of their teams, despite limited authority and autonomy. Although times of crises highlight their pivotal bridging role between organisational strategy and operational realities, their resilience strategies remain underexplored. Research approach/design and method: A qualitative interpretive approach was adopted, utilising semi-structured interviews with eight middle managers. Main findings: Four key themes concerning middle managers’ resilience during crises emerged: (1) navigating control and uncertainty, (2) organisational and familial support, (3) evolving leadership in crisis and (4) coping strategies and personal well-being. Implications for practice: Middle managers’ resilience can be enhanced by addressing basic neuro-reflexive needs, namely control and orientation, attachment and pleasure and pain regulation, which collectively strengthen self-esteem. Contribution/value-add: The study offers insights to support human resource (HR) practitioners and industrial psychologists in designing development programmes that enhance resilience capacity at the middle-management level.
Keywords: basic psychological needs; global and regional crises; middle management; neuropsychotherapy; resilience
Metadata Record
References 46
- Arden, J.B. (2019). Mind-brain-gene: Toward psychotherapy integration. W.W. Norton & Company.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
- Cozolino, L. (2017). The neuroscience of psychotherapy: Healing the social brain (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
- Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
- Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
- Davidson, R.J., & McEwen, B.S. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity: Stress and interventions to promote well-being. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3093
- Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2010). Self-determination. In I.B. Weiner, & W.E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (4th ed.). Wiley.
- Edmondson, A.C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons.
- Edmondson, A.C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
- European Parliament, & Council of the European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1–88. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
- Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2013). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psychologist, 18(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000124
- Fredrickson, B.L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In E.A. Plant, & P.G. Devine (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Academic Press.
- Geldenhuys, D. J. (2020). Valuing and adapting appreciative inquiry to enhance well-being using a neuropsychotherapeutic framework. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 46, Article a1823. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v46i0.1823
- Grawe, K. (2007). Neuropsychtherapy: How the neurosciences inform effective psychotherapy. Psychology Press.
- Herman, J.P., McKlveen, J.M., Ghosal, S., Kopp, B., Wulsin, A., Makinson, R., Scheimann, J., & Myers, B. (2016). Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical stress response. Comprehensive Physiology, 6(2), 603–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c150015
- Jooss, S., McDonnell, A., & Skuza, A. (2024). Middle managers as key talent management stakeholders: Navigating paradoxes. European Management Review, 21(2), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12587
- Kalisch, R., Müller, M.B., & Tüscher, O. (2015). A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400082X
- Kashdan, T.B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
- Kim, J.J., Yoon, S., & Kim, T.S. (2022). Stress and the HPA axis: A review of the neurobiological mechanisms of resilience. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, Article 9694420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.9694420
- Lincoln, Y.S., Lynham, S.A., & Guba, E.G. (2018). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. Revisited in N.K. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 108–150). Sage.
- Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C.M., & Avolio, B.J. (2021). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford University Press.
- Maddux, J.E., & Kleiman, E.M. (2016). Self-efficacy: A foundational concept for positive clinical psychology. In M.W. Gallagher, & S.J. Lopez (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of positive clinical psychology (pp. 89–101). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Masten, A.S. (2021). Resilience in development: Progress and transformation (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Masten, A.S., & Reed, M.G.J. (2020). Resilience in development: Contributions from research on children, communities, and systems. In S.J. Lopez, & J.S. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology (4th ed., pp. 565–578). Oxford University Press.
- McEwen, B.S., & Akil, H. (2020). Revisiting the stress concept: Implications for affective disorders. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0733-19.2019
- Neeley, T. (2021). Remote work revolution: Succeeding from anywhere. Harper Business.
- Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001
- OECD. (2023). OECD employment outlook 2023: Artificial intelligence and the labour market. OECD Publishing.
- Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
- Porges, S.W. (2021). Polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. Norton Professional Books.
- Rossouw, P.J. (2014a). Neuropsychotherapy: Theoretical underpinnings and clinical applications. Mediros.
- Rossouw, P.J. (2014b). The neuroscience of resilience. Neuropsychotherapy, 2(1), 3–13.
- Sapolsky, R.M. (2015). Why zebras don‘t get ulcers: The acclaimed guide to stress, stress-related diseases, and coping (3rd ed.). Holt Paperbacks.
- Seligman, M.E.P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Atria Books.
- Sheffi, Y. (2020). The New (Ab)Normal: Reshaping business and supply chain strategy beyond COVID-19. CTL Media.
- Siegel, D.J. (2020). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Southwick, S.M., & Charney, D.S. (2018). Resilience: The science of mastering life’s greatest challenges (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Stebbins, R.A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. Sage.
- Teo, W.L., Lee, M., & Lim, W.-S. (2017). The relational activation of resilience model: How leadership activates resilience in an organizational crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(3), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12179
- Tugade, M.M., & Fredrickson, B.L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333.
- Vega-Fernández, G., Tapia, A., & Buenrostro, M. (2025). A comprehensive overview of stress, resilience, and neuroplasticity mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(7), 3028. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073028
- Wissing, M.P., Nel, E.D., Temane, Q.M., Van Staden, C., & Van Zyl, L.E. (2022). Meaning- and relational well-being: A mixed-method study with South African adults. Current Psychology, 41, 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00407-2
- Wong, P.T.P. (2023). A new positive psychology: Theory, research, and applications. Springer.
- World Economic Forum. (2022). The global risks report 2022 (17th ed.). World Economic Forum.