Alif Index Evaluation: Four Stages

Your Journal's Journey to Excellence

Alif Index Evaluation

Stage One Evaluation

Stage One evaluation focuses on verifying the journal’s foundational compliance with minimum scholarly publishing requirements. At this level, ALIF Index assesses whether the journal demonstrates a transparent digital presence, identifiable governance structure, clearly declared policies, and the basic technical readiness required to participate in the SEIPID ecosystem.

The purpose of this stage is to confirm the journal’s operational legitimacy and public accountability before advancing toward integrity-based indexing. This stage evaluates structural visibility rather than scholarly impact.

1. Journal Identity & Metadata
Provide the full official journal title. New journals must ensure the title is unique by checking the ISSN Portal before finalising it. The title must appear consistently on the journal website, within article PDFs, and across all official pages. If the journal has undergone a title change, the change must be documented with dates and a clear explanation. If the original title is in another language, an English version must also be provided.
Provide a standard abbreviation (short title), ideally based on the initials or an internationally recognisable form of the full journal title.
Provide the print ISSN and/or online ISSN, where applicable. New journals may apply at Stage One without an ISSN for Alif Pre-Indexing, but an ISSN will be required for Alif Index L1 validation before indexing.
Specify the format: Online, Print, or Hybrid. ALIF accepts Online and Hybrid journals. Print-only journals are not eligible.
Specify the access model clearly: Open Access, Subscription/Paid, or Hybrid. This information must be visible on the journal website.
Clearly state the journal’s scope and publication frequency. The peer-review model (single-blind, double-blind, open, or other) must be explicitly documented.
Clearly state whether any fees apply (including APCs or other charges). If applicable, include the amount, the payment method, and the refund policy. Hidden charges are not permitted.
The journal must clearly disclose its governance and ownership structure. Provide details on who legally owns and operates the journal (e.g., university, scholarly society, independent publisher, or commercial entity), and identify the body responsible for appointing the Editor-in-Chief and editorial board members. A written statement of editorial independence should be available, confirming that editorial decisions are made without interference from the publisher or sponsoring organization. In addition, provide the publisher’s full legal name, physical address, official domain-based email address, phone number, and website (if applicable). The publisher’s identity must be clearly displayed and verifiable on the journal website. Generic email addresses (e.g., @gmail, @yahoo) are discouraged for official communication. Any funding sources or sponsorship arrangements supporting the journal (including institutional support, APC-based models, or external grants) must also be transparently disclosed.
Provide full names, affiliations, and official emails (or a verified profile link). For new journals, the minimum requirement is an Editor-in-Chief and at least one additional editor aligned with the journal’s scope.
Clearly state the licensing model (e.g., CC BY, CC BY-NC) and the copyright policy (whether copyright is held by the author or the publisher).
2. Technical Integrity: Digital Presence & Website
Provide a short, unique domain or subdomain. The journal URL and the full-text access method must be clearly stated and publicly accessible.
Mandatory — site must use HTTPS
The website must be user-friendly, mobile responsive, and easy to navigate. Content should be clearly written, well formatted, and readable.
How is content archived for long-term preservation? Backup plan for long-term preservation.
The website should be consistently accessible. All pages and links must work correctly, with no broken links or incorrect redirects.
OJS / WordPress / Custom — clearly identified
Each published article and issue must be hosted on a unique, permanent, and resolvable landing page within the journal website. This page must include essential metadata (e.g., article title, author names and affiliations, abstract, keywords, publication dates), a structured reference list, and access to the full-text PDF to ensure transparency, traceability, and long-term scholarly accessibility.
3. Article-Level Basics
Each article must include the original title, abstract, and 3–7 keywords. If the article is published in a language other than English, the title, abstract, keywords, and reference list must also be provided in English. The article PDF should reflect the same information. In addition, each article must clearly display the received, accepted, and published dates to ensure transparency in the editorial process.
Each article must include the author’s full name, affiliation, country, and a valid email or X-PEN iD or ORCID.
Article PDFs must be professionally formatted and easy to read. For new journals, submit a sample PDF using ALIF’s recommended structure to demonstrate basic publishing readiness.

Journals that successfully meet Stage One requirements are admitted into ALIF Pre-Index, become eligible to obtain SEIPID plans, and may proceed to initiate their L1 evaluation application automatically. Journals that do not meet the criteria may reapply at any time after addressing the identified compliance gaps.

Alif Index L1 Evaluation

Stage Two Evaluation

Stage Two evaluation assesses the journal’s operational integrity and publishing consistency over time. At this level, ALIF Index examines whether the journal demonstrates sustained editorial activity, policy-driven governance, geographic diversity in authorship and editorial representation, and adherence to recognised ethical and publication standards.

This stage evaluates the journal’s functional maturity and readiness for integrity-based indexing by reviewing real publication practices rather than declared intent.

The journal must demonstrate a minimum of six (6) months of continuous publication history prior to applying for ALIF Index L1 evaluation. During this period, the journal must have published at least ten (10) peer-reviewed articles or a minimum of two (2) complete issues.

Issues must be released within a reasonable and declared timeframe in accordance with the journal’s stated publication frequency (e.g., quarterly, biannual, etc.). Journals showing irregular publication patterns, excessive delays, or unexplained gaps between issues may be considered non-compliant at this stage.

The editorial board must consist of at least five (5) members, including an Editor-in-Chief. All editorial members must be clearly listed on the journal website with their full names, institutional affiliations, academic roles, and (preferably) official or institutional email addresses.

The board must also demonstrate a reasonable level of geographic diversity, with members representing different institutions and, where possible, multiple countries or academic regions. Editorial appointments should reflect subject expertise relevant to the journal’s declared scope and disciplinary focus.

To ensure institutional and geographic diversity, at least twenty-five percent (30%) of the authors published in the journal must be affiliated with institutions outside the journal’s country of publication.

In addition, not more than twenty percent (20%) of the total published articles within an issue or evaluation period should be authored or co-authored by members of the editorial board. This measure is intended to reduce editorial authorship bias and promote external scholarly participation.

The journal must publicly display and adhere to recognised academic publishing standards through clearly documented policies, including:

• A defined Peer Review Policy

• Description of the Peer Review Process and review timelines (step-by-step workflow)

• Plagiarism Detection Policy

• Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Policy

• Conflict of Interest Policy

• Corrections and Retractions Policy

• Editorial Independence and Integrity Policy

• Authorship Limits and Contribution Policy

• Publication Ethics and Malpractice Policy

• Data Availability Policy

• Language & Copyediting Policy

• Privacy Statement outlining how personal data of authors, reviewers, and readers is collected and protected

• Multiple/Concurrent Submission Policy prohibiting simultaneous submission to multiple journals

• Preprint Policy explaining whether preprints are permitted and how they should be cited

In addition, the journal must provide:

• Reviewer Selection Criteria and Responsibilities

• Appeals and Complaints Policy for editorial decision disputes

• Post-Publication Discussion Policy (e.g., Letters to the Editor or critiques)

• Permissions Policy for reuse, translation, or republication of journal content

• Archiving Policy describing long-term digital preservation arrangements (e.g., CLOCKSS, Portico, institutional repositories)

The journal must provide comprehensive Author Guidelines that clearly describe:

• Accepted manuscript types (e.g., original research, review articles, case studies, short communications, etc.)

• Formatting requirements, including article structure, word limits, citation and referencing style

• Section-specific submission requirements where applicable

• Submission workflow, including how manuscripts are submitted and what authors can expect during the review process

These guidelines must be publicly accessible on the journal website and written in a clear and professional manner.

Published articles must align with the journal’s declared aims and scope. During L1 evaluation, ALIF will conduct a general content-level assessment of selected articles to examine their relevance to the stated scope, methodological coherence, and overall scholarly quality.

This review is not a detailed or in-depth peer review of individual articles at this stage, but rather a broad consistency check to ensure thematic alignment and academic relevance across published content.

Journals that successfully pass Stage Two are granted ALIF Index L1 status; those rejected at first attempt may reapply after making the required improvements. If rejected upon reapplication, the journal will be placed under an embargo period of 6–18 months before the next submission is permitted.

ALIF Index L2 Evaluation

Stage Three Evaluation (L2 — Established)

Stage Three (L2) evaluates whether a journal has moved beyond basic compliance and operational readiness into sustained, mature publishing. At this level, ALIF Index reviews consistency over multiple years, verifies measurable citation engagement, and conducts controlled sampling of article quality and peer-review reporting to confirm real-world scholarly standards.

L2 assessment focuses on evidence-based performance and integrity signals: stable publication history, meaningful citation footprint, quality-controlled publishing outputs, and international participation across authorship and editorial governance.

  • Active Publishing: At least 2–3 years of continuous publication
  • Minimum Output: At least 40 articles OR 10–12 issues
  • Regularity: No unexplained gaps greater than 6 months
  • On-time Publication: Issues published according to the declared schedule
  • J-Citation (Total Citations): > 100
  • X-Impact (Lagged Impact Score): Threshold defined by ALIF per discipline
  • ALIF Core Score (Rolling Performance): Threshold defined by ALIF per discipline
  • ALIF Index (h-type): > 7
  • ALIF Index² (10+ cited outputs): > 5
  • ے-Index (100+ cited outputs): 0 (informational at L2; performance-weighted at L3)
  • Random Sample: 2–5 articles randomly selected from previous years
  • Methodological Rigor: Research design, data handling/analysis, and conclusions reviewed at a general level
  • Originality: Plagiarism screening (iThenticate/Turnitin or equivalent); target < 15–20%
  • Referencing Quality: References relevant, reasonably current, and correctly structured
  • Language Quality: Professional language standard; copyediting evidence where applicable
  • Peer Review Evidence: 1–3 original articles from the previous 2 years selected; reviewer reports requested for manual evaluation of feedback quality
  • Author Diversity: At least 40% authors from outside the journal’s country
  • Institutional Spread: Multiple institutions represented (avoid single-institution dominance)
  • Editorial Board Diversity: At least 50% editors from outside the publisher’s country
  • Editorial Expertise: Editors demonstrate publication record in relevant field(s)
  • Self-citation Monitoring: Journal-level self-citation tracked; thresholds defined by ALIF per discipline
  • Citation Manipulation Safeguards: Detection of abnormal cross-journal citation patterns
  • Coercive Citation Prohibition: Explicit policy and complaint channel
  • Annual Transparency Stats: Approx. submissions, acceptance rate bands, median review time, and publication counts

Journals that meet L2 criteria are classified as ALIF Index L2 (Established) and may become eligible to apply for L3 (Excellence) once sustained performance thresholds and long-window impact indicators are met.

Ready to Get Your Journal Evaluated?

Join the growing community of journals committed to integrity and recognition.